Lady Gaga’s Duet With Tony Bennett Released
September 15, 2011 by Gagaism.org
Lady Gaga is a tramp in her new duet with Tony Bennett.
‘The Lady is a Tramp,’ the opening track on Bennett’s upcoming Duets II album, was released on YouTube today, and early reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Here’s a small sampling of the praise Gaga and Bennett are receiving.
- Idolator’s Becky Bain gave Gaga great praise, writing, “We all know Gaga has no problem belting out a show-stopping number, but damn if we aren’t surprised just how effortless the pop star sounds crooning this classic showtune.”
- Amanda Dobbins, writing for New York Magazine’s Vulture, was also pleasantly surprised. “[The] Lady has the sassy, slightly show-tune-y voice down cold. It works! Unless Gaga decides to pay tribute to Disney’s Lady and the Tramp with the costuming (we fear dog suits), this collaboration can go in the “success” column.”
- Even Gawker’s Brian Moylan, who has had a long history of being not-so-kind to Gaga had to admit, “It’s really good!”
‘The Lady is a Tramp’ will be available for purchase on Tuesday (along with Bennett’s full Duets II album), but in the meantime you can enjoy the song by listening to the stream below.
Listen:
Woah! I’m really digging the template/theme of this website. It’s simple, yet effective.
A lot of times it’s tough to get that “perfect balance” between usability and visual appearance. I must say you’ve
done a excellent job with this. Additionally, the blog loads super fast for me on
Opera. Exceptional Blog!
[...] and Lady Gaga’s duet of ‘The Lady is a Tramp,’ which was immediately met with overwhelmingly positive feedback . It has since been released on iTunes and Amazon. We have embedded the song below for your [...]
My bad, Jarraxe. Actually we should NOT put any undue content in Gaga’s wikipedia. When I looked at her singles, that’s where all the information lies, to the point where the singles description are so long, that it actually is almost (or more) than the lady gaga wikipedia page itself and filled with almost endless minutiae! So, I believe the biography part for BTW era is supposed to have the due/real content and no fancraft stuff which would make it look unprofessional. Thanks Jarraxe for your support, DN.
Thanks for looking into it! I got your e-mail. Sorry for the late reply. It’s good to know how that all works anyway. I would like to know how to edit Wikipedia anyway because I’d like to add a page about the website at some point. Thanks again for all your help and support. You’re awesome!
No need to apologize about email replying. You have so much stuff on your hands! I’ll look more into how to obtain access to semi-protected sites. Once you do, don’t be upset if your comments get overturned by one of the many experienced wiki users who are kindly keeping Gaga’s pages professional and objective! It happens to the best of them, and Gaga seems to have a lot of promininent editors, which is great. You’re wonderful!
Hey Jarraxe. I sent you email re:Gaga’s wikipedia. in short, it is in fact updated and doesn’t contain as many details as Perry’s wikipedia since Perry consists of more “Undue” content from fans, whereas Gaga doesn’t. The gentleman who helped me wiht this didn’t tell me how I can add Undue content to Gaga’s page since he’s really against it (he prunes both the Madonna and Gaga wikipedia). But I’m heartened that Gaga’s page is being updated when “Due” content is available.
I’m going to do more research into finding out how I can add undue content to Gaga’s page since she deserves to have her VMA awards mentioned, among other honors…
This proves that Gaga can do anything. Bennett is stunning, he’s pure class.